NEW JAI BHARAT SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL ALUWADGAON vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETORY AND ORS — WP/3919/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 14, 19 AND 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030146222026
Filing Number
WP/10963/2026
Filing Date
10-04-2026
Registration No
WP/3919/2026
Registration Date
15-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
Coram
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NEW JAI BHARAT SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL ALUWADGAON
Adv. POKALE DNYANESHWAR BHAURAO
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETORY AND ORS
Adv. PULKUNDWAR SANTOSH BABURAO FOR R.NO. 4 1123
THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA THR. ITS SEC.
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA DIRECTORATE OF PRIMARY EDUCATION
THE EDUCATION OFFICER PRIMARY
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
Summary: The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad disposed of seven consolidated writ petitions filed by private schools seeking reimbursement of fees for 25% of students admitted under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The court directed respondent authorities to independently scrutinize the petitioners' proposals on merit and decide within 4 weeks, with payment to follow within 4 weeks thereafter if found entitled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad disposed of seven consolidated writ petitions filed by private schools seeking reimbursement of fees for 25% of students admitted under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The court directed respondent authorities to independently scrutinize the petitioners' proposals on merit and decide within 4 weeks, with payment to follow within 4 weeks thereafter if found entitled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts