PAGARIYA AUTO PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY vs UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/4779/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
CNR: HCBM030146202026
Filing Number
WP/10961/2026
Filing Date
10-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/4779/2026
Registration Date
29-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PAGARIYA AUTO PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
Adv. TOTALA RAHUL RAMESHWAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND ORS
Adv. KOTHARI PRATIK P. FOR R.NO. 4 AND 5 1123
-
2.CENTRAL BOARD O INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS
-
3.COMMISSIONER CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE
-
4.COMMISSIONER OF CGST AN CENTRAL EXCISE
-
5.OFFICE OF THE SUPRINTENDENT OF CGST
Case History
-
03-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
03-Jul-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-JadhavView PDF
Case Summary: WP/4779/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted ad-interim relief to Pagariya Auto Private Limited in its GST dispute with the Union of India. The court found the petitioner's case prima facie covered by the Star Engineers precedent and rejected the respondents' requirement for an additional 10% tax deposit, ruling that if the petitioner committed only a bonafide inadvertent mistake, no such deposit should be required. Notice issued returnable 03/07/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4779/2026
Case Summary: WP/4779/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted ad-interim relief to Pagariya Auto Private Limited in its GST dispute with the Union of India. The court found the petitioner's case prima facie covered by the Star Engineers precedent and rejected the respondents' requirement for an additional 10% tax deposit, ruling that if the petitioner committed only a bonafide inadvertent mistake, no such deposit should be required. Notice issued returnable 03/07/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts