RAJENDRA GULABSING JADHAV vs KAVITA SANJAY JADHAV ALIAS KAVITA PRABHAT CHAVAN AND ORS — CA/4324/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 03rd August 2026.
CNR: HCBM030145752026
Filing Number
CA/10923/2026
Filing Date
10-Apr-2026
Registration No
CA/4324/2026
Registration Date
10-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote
Coram
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJENDRA GULABSING JADHAV
Adv. RODGE KRISHNA PRATAP
Respondent(s)
-
1.KAVITA SANJAY JADHAV ALIAS KAVITA PRABHAT CHAVAN AND ORS
Case History
-
03-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
03-Aug-2026
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. DhoteView PDF
The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, adjourned multiple writ petitions, family court appeals, and other matters to three separate dates (03.08.2026, 04.08.2026, and 06.08.2026) due to paucity of time. All interim relief, undertakings, and statements, if any, shall continue until the next hearing dates. The primary case (WP No. 6262 of 2023) between Dhananjay Eknath Patil and the State of Maharashtra was adjourned without substantive orders on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CA/4324/2026
The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, adjourned multiple writ petitions, family court appeals, and other matters to three separate dates (03.08.2026, 04.08.2026, and 06.08.2026) due to paucity of time. All interim relief, undertakings, and statements, if any, shall continue until the next hearing dates. The primary case (WP No. 6262 of 2023) between Dhananjay Eknath Patil and the State of Maharashtra was adjourned without substantive orders on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts