HARIDAS EKNATH GOPALGHARE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — ABA/615/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Withdrawn on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030144852026

Filing Number

ABA/3617/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

ABA/615/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Withdrawn

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 274,275,123,3(5)
Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 Section 26(2),26(2)(i),57,59

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARIDAS EKNATH GOPALGHARE

    Adv. RAJENDRA D SANAP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

    Adv. P.P. FOR R/SOLE 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF

    Case Summary: ABA/615/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of Haridas Eknath Gopalghare's anticipatory bail application by allowing its withdrawal. After hearing the applicant's counsel, the court indicated it was not inclined to grant relief, whereupon the counsel sought and obtained permission to withdraw the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  4. 06-May-2026

    Due Admission [ After Notice ]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  5. 24-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF

  6. 24-Apr-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  7. 20-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABA/615/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ABA/615/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of Haridas Eknath Gopalghare's anticipatory bail application by allowing its withdrawal. After hearing the applicant's counsel, the court indicated it was not inclined to grant relief, whereupon the counsel sought and obtained permission to withdraw the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case