ANIL GORAKSHA BORUDE AND OTHERS SAPKAL SANDIP R vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY AND OTHERS — PIL/21/2022
Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030144462022
Filing Number
PIL/10952/2022
Filing Date
11-04-2022
Registration No
PIL/21/2022
Registration Date
09-05-2022
Judge
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
Coram
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
Bench Type
Division
Category
LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES ( 21 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANIL GORAKSHA BORUDE AND OTHERS SAPKAL SANDIP R
TANMAY MUKUND KULKARNI
RAJENDRA NUVARUTI BHOSALE
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY AND OTHERS
THE DIRECTOR TOWN PLANNING DEPARTMENT
THE JOINT DIRECTOR TOWN PLANNING DEPARTMENT
THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR TOWN PLANNING AHMEDNAGAR
THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME)
OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME)
PIL CIVIL [FOR ADMISSION]
DUE ADMISSION CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2022 | OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME) |
| 16-05-2022 | OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME) |
| 12-07-2022 | PIL CIVIL [FOR ADMISSION] |
| 17-04-2026 | DUE ADMISSION CIVIL |
| 22-01-2026 |
Orders
The PIL was disposed of as withdrawn after the court expressed its disinclination to grant relief to the petitioners. The petitioners' advocate sought withdrawal upon instructions, and the court ordered refund of Rs. 1,00,000 deposited by the petitioners as proof of bona fides. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The PIL was disposed of as withdrawn after the court expressed its disinclination to grant relief to the petitioners. The petitioners' advocate sought withdrawal upon instructions, and the court ordered refund of Rs. 1,00,000 deposited by the petitioners as proof of bona fides. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts