SANTOSH MADHAVRAO DHUTRAJ vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — APPLN/1333/2026

Case under Limitation Act 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED on 27th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030144132026

e-Filing Number

09-04-2026

Filing Number

APPLN/3601/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

APPLN/1333/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay S. Waghwase

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay S. Waghwase

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

27-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANTOSH MADHAVRAO DHUTRAJ

    Adv. Lomte Ashwini Annasaheb

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay S. WaghwaseView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed Santosh Madhavrao Dhutraj's application to condone a 654-day delay in filing a criminal appeal against his conviction for offences under IPC Sections 307, 353, 504, and 506. The court accepted that the delay was caused by the applicant's poor financial condition and time spent pursuing legal aid appointment. The court allowed the application in the interest of justice and directed the registry to register the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Due Admission -Criminal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay S. Waghwase

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    For Admission - Fresh - Criminal Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay S. Waghwase

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay S. WaghwaseView PDF

  6. 17-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. APPLN/1333/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed Santosh Madhavrao Dhutraj's application to condone a 654-day delay in filing a criminal appeal against his conviction for offences under IPC Sections 307, 353, 504, and 506. The court accepted that the delay was caused by the applicant's poor financial condition and time spent pursuing legal aid appointment. The court allowed the application in the interest of justice and directed the registry to register the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case