SANTOSH MADHAVRAO DHUTRAJ vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — APPLN/1333/2026
Case under Limitation Act 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED on 27th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030144132026
e-Filing Number
09-04-2026
Filing Number
APPLN/3601/2026
Filing Date
10-04-2026
Registration No
APPLN/1333/2026
Registration Date
10-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY S. WAGHWASE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY S. WAGHWASE
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
27th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANTOSH MADHAVRAO DHUTRAJ
Adv. Lomte Ashwini Annasaheb
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY S. WAGHWASE
FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS
DUE ADMISSION -CRIMINAL
FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS |
| 27-04-2026 | DUE ADMISSION -CRIMINAL |
| 24-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed Santosh Madhavrao Dhutraj's application to condone a 654-day delay in filing a criminal appeal against his conviction for offences under IPC Sections 307, 353, 504, and 506. The court accepted that the delay was caused by the applicant's poor financial condition and time spent pursuing legal aid appointment. The court allowed the application in the interest of justice and directed the registry to register the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed Santosh Madhavrao Dhutraj's application to condone a 654-day delay in filing a criminal appeal against his conviction for offences under IPC Sections 307, 353, 504, and 506. The court accepted that the delay was caused by the applicant's poor financial condition and time spent pursuing legal aid appointment. The court allowed the application in the interest of justice and directed the registry to register the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts