SURESH KISAN BARI THROUGH GPA NITIN ASHOK CHAUDHARI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/5343/2017
Case under Constitution of India. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030144132017
Next Hearing
26th April 2017
Filing Number
WP/11789/2017
Filing Date
05-04-2017
Registration No
WP/5343/2017
Registration Date
19-04-2017
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SURESH KISAN BARI THROUGH GPA NITIN ASHOK CHAUDHARI
Adv. Kale Ajeet B.
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Adv. ,Patil Pradip R.,GP FOR R/ 1 TO 4,MUNDE SACHIN B. 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR
URGENT CIRCULATION (WP)
URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL
URGENT CIRCULATION (WP)
URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL
URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2019 | URGENT CIRCULATION (WP) |
| 26-04-2017 | URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL |
| 07-01-2020 | URGENT CIRCULATION (WP) |
| 04-01-2018 | URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL |
| 04-03-2020 | URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL |
Orders
Case Summary: WP 5343/2017 Decision: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the writ petition and directed Jalgaon Municipal Corporation to pay compensation to the petitioner for his reserved land within 12 weeks. The court held that acquisition of open land in a sanctioned layout does not vest in the corporation free of cost merely because of a condition in the sanctioning order; the landowner is entitled to compensation under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP 5343/2017 Decision: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the writ petition and directed Jalgaon Municipal Corporation to pay compensation to the petitioner for his reserved land within 12 weeks. The court held that acquisition of open land in a sanctioned layout does not vest in the corporation free of cost merely because of a condition in the sanctioning order; the landowner is entitled to compensation under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts