VACHALABAI TUKARAM MANE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR OSMANABAD — CA/4675/2026
Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 157. Disposed: Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030144052026
e-Filing Number
10-04-2026
Filing Number
CA/10797/2026
Filing Date
10-04-2026
Registration No
CA/4675/2026
Registration Date
18-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
LAND ACQUISITION - SINGLE BENCH ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VACHALABAI TUKARAM MANE
Adv. Patne Santosh N.
SHESABAI GOPINATH MANE DIED PARAVATI MAHADEO BHOSALE DIED MAHADEV BHANUDAS BHOSLE
DATTA BHANUDAS BHOSLE
SUMAN GOPINATH MANE
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR OSMANABAD
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KRISHNA KHORE DEVELOPMENT MAHAMANDAL OMERGA
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER IRRIGATION PROJECT STRENGHTING MAJBUTIKARAN DIVISION OMERGA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
URGENT ORDERS -CIVIL
FOR ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | URGENT ORDERS -CIVIL |
| 04-05-2026 | FOR ORDERS |
Orders
Case Summary: CA/4675/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) allowed poor agriculturists' applications to withdraw 50% of land acquisition compensation deposited by the acquiring body, contingent on their undertaking to redeposit the amount with accrued interest if the state's appeal succeeds. The court also granted condonation of delay in filing appeals and stayed implementation of the impugned Reference Court orders, balancing the landowners' financial hardship against the state's recovery concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CA/4675/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) allowed poor agriculturists' applications to withdraw 50% of land acquisition compensation deposited by the acquiring body, contingent on their undertaking to redeposit the amount with accrued interest if the state's appeal succeeds. The court also granted condonation of delay in filing appeals and stayed implementation of the impugned Reference Court orders, balancing the landowners' financial hardship against the state's recovery concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts