SATISH MANOHAR DUDHBHATE DIED THR LRS LALITA SATISH DUDHBHATE AND ANR Jaydeep Samadhan kadam vs The Oriental Insurance com Ltd and Others — CA/4466/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act 1939 & 1988 Section section 175. Disposed: Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030143652026
e-Filing Number
06-04-2026
Filing Number
CA/10761/2026
Filing Date
09-04-2026
Registration No
CA/4466/2026
Registration Date
16-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
MACP - SINGLE BENCH ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SATISH MANOHAR DUDHBHATE DIED THR LRS LALITA SATISH DUDHBHATE AND ANR Jaydeep Samadhan kadam
Samarth Satish Dudhbhate
Adv. Jaydeep Samadhan kadam
Respondent(s)
The Oriental Insurance com Ltd and Others
Adv. COPY NOT SERVED ON ADV. NAGESH G. TALEKAR FOR R/3 AND 4 1123
Mahesh Veerbhadrappa Halge
Manohar Nagnath Dudhabhate
Laxmi Manohar Dudhbhate
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH
URGENT ORDERS (CIVIL)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | URGENT ORDERS (CIVIL) |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partially allowed the withdrawal application in this insurance compensation case arising from a motorcycle accident. Though the insurance company contended there was doubtful evidence of the rider's negligence, the court held the insurer liable and directed payment of 50% of the compensation amount with interest and costs. Additionally, a stay on judgment execution was granted subject to the respondent depositing the full compensation amount within 12 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partially allowed the withdrawal application in this insurance compensation case arising from a motorcycle accident. Though the insurance company contended there was doubtful evidence of the rider's negligence, the court held the insurer liable and directed payment of 50% of the compensation amount with interest and costs. Additionally, a stay on judgment execution was granted subject to the respondent depositing the full compensation amount within 12 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts