MANDAR PRADIP PATRIKAR PARTER SOFMATE SYSTEM LLP AND ANOTHER vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — ABA/607/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED on 24th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM030142922026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

ABA/3573/2026

Filing Date

09-04-2026

Registration No

ABA/607/2026

Registration Date

09-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

24th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Information Technology Act, 2000 (Amended 2008) Section 43,66,66(C),66(D),72
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 3(5),316(4),318(4),336(3)

Petitioner(s)

MANDAR PRADIP PATRIKAR PARTER SOFMATE SYSTEM LLP AND ANOTHER

Adv. More Kumar Gaurav M.

SHAILA KEDAR PARTER OF SOFMATE SYSTEM LLP

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Adv. P.P. FOR R/1 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN

17-04-2026

ANTICIPATORY BAIL - FIRST TIME

24-04-2026

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN
24-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed anticipatory bail applications by Softmate System LLP partners, finding the Sessions Court erred in rejecting them solely based on Section 81 of the Information Technology Act having overriding effect. The court set aside the Sessions Judge's order and remitted the matter for fresh merit-based consideration, granting interim protection for 7 days pending re-adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed anticipatory bail applications by Softmate System LLP partners, finding the Sessions Court erred in rejecting them solely based on Section 81 of the Information Technology Act having overriding effect. The court set aside the Sessions Judge's order and remitted the matter for fresh merit-based consideration, granting interim protection for 7 days pending re-adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Information Technology Act, 2000 (Amended 2008) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case