SUBHADRA LAXMAN DOLAS AND ANOTHER vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/4716/2017

Case under Constitution of India. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Apr-2017

CNR: HCBM030141252017

Filing Number

WP/11565/2017

Filing Date

04-Apr-2017

Registration No

WP/4716/2017

Registration Date

06-Apr-2017

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India
Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act 1958 & Ruls

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUBHADRA LAXMAN DOLAS AND ANOTHER

    Adv. PATEKAR NARENDRA B

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

    Adv. GP FOR R.1 TO 4 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of multiple consolidated writ petitions filed in 2017, finding that the petitioners' tenure had already been completed in 2020, rendering the petitions moot. The court ruled that since nothing survived in the petitions, they were disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2020

    Due Admission -CIVIL

    According To Sitting List

  4. 10-Apr-2017

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,hon'ble Shri Justice K.L. WadaneView PDF

  5. 10-Apr-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 04-Apr-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4716/2017

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of multiple consolidated writ petitions filed in 2017, finding that the petitioners' tenure had already been completed in 2020, rendering the petitions moot. The court ruled that since nothing survived in the petitions, they were disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case