MAHESH VIJAY MAKHAMALE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — BA/690/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Next hearing 18-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030140332026

Filing Number

BA/3521/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

BA/690/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(2)(f),74,78,137(2),351(2),3(5)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4,6,8,12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHESH VIJAY MAKHAMALE

    Adv. GHANEKAR NILESH S.,Tidke Aditya Salikram,Tidke Aditya Salikram, ,Tidke Aditya Salikram

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

    Adv. P.P. FOR R/1 1123

  2. 2.XYZ

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Due Orders Criminal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

  3. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

    In Bail Application No. 690/2026, the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the matter to 18.06.2026. Respondent No.2 was granted legal assistance, with Mr. Jitendera S. Jain appointed as her advocate, and the court ordered the office to supply case copies to the newly appointed lawyer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 05-May-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

  5. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

  6. 20-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA/690/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In Bail Application No. 690/2026, the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the matter to 18.06.2026. Respondent No.2 was granted legal assistance, with Mr. Jitendera S. Jain appointed as her advocate, and the court ordered the office to supply case copies to the newly appointed lawyer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case