SUNANDA TUKARAM BHOSALE AND ORS. vs THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF JOINT CHARITY COMMISSIONER, LATUR REGION LATUR AND ORS. — CA/4489/2026
Case under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act 1950 Section 72(4). Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030139372026
Filing Number
CA/10427/2026
Filing Date
08-04-2026
Registration No
CA/4489/2026
Registration Date
16-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
OTHER APPEALS - SINGLE BENCH ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUNANDA TUKARAM BHOSALE AND ORS.
Adv. SHAIKH TAREK MOBIN H.
TUKARAM NAMDEV BHOSALE
NAGNATH DEVASTHAN TRUST, THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT, SUNANDA TUKARAM BHOSALE,
Respondent(s)
THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF JOINT CHARITY COMMISSIONER, LATUR REGION LATUR AND ORS.
THE ASSISTANT CHARITY COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF ASSISTANT CHARITY COMMISSIONER, OSMANABAD,
GAJENDRA BAPU PURI, DEAD
SUDHIR SHAHAJI PURI
KALIDAS BALBHIM NICHAL
JAIPRAKASH LIMBRAJ RANKHAMB
NAGNATH SHIVAJI MADAJE
CHANDRAKANT SIDRAM THOMBARE
HANMANT RAMDAS KAMBLE
MILU GANGADHAR KAMBLE
HAJRAT DAGDU TAMBOLI
VIJAY MANIK NIRMALE,
JAYSHREE DHANRAJ TAKALE
Orders
Case Summary: CA/4489/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the First Appeal filed by Sunanda Tukaram Bhosale and others against the Joint Charity Commissioner as withdrawn. The court accepted the appellant's advocate's submission that a Writ Petition was the appropriate remedy rather than a First Appeal, and granted liberty to file the appropriate proceeding before the proper forum. All pending civil applications were consequently disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CA/4489/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the First Appeal filed by Sunanda Tukaram Bhosale and others against the Joint Charity Commissioner as withdrawn. The court accepted the appellant's advocate's submission that a Writ Petition was the appropriate remedy rather than a First Appeal, and granted liberty to file the appropriate proceeding before the proper forum. All pending civil applications were consequently disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts