DEHLYA LOTYA PAWARA AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/685/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030139122026

Filing Number

BA/3486/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

BA/685/2026

Registration Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103,109,189,190,191,115,352,351

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEHLYA LOTYA PAWARA AND OTHERS

    Adv. BORSE MAYUR BHARATRAO

  2. 2.DINESH KURSHYA PAWARA

  3. 3.CHAMPA SAMA PAWARA

  4. 4.RATILAL LOTYA PAWARA

  5. 5.TIGAN BEDA PAWARA

  6. 6.RAVYA SAMA PAWARA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

    Adv. P.P. FOR R/SOLE 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

    Case Summary: BA/685/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted bail to all ten applicants in Crime No. 167 of 2025, arising from a mob assault that resulted in one death. The court found that while applicants participated in the unlawful assembly and assault, their individual roles were limited to kicks and blows without weapons, and mens rea could not be attributed to them individually. Key Reasoning: The court analyzed post-mortem evidence and witness statements, concluding that co-accused Wanya and Rosha—who wielded weapons—were the primary authors of fatal head injuries. The applicants' involvement with the deceased was less severe. Critically, the court found insufficient evidence that applicants shared a common object or knowledge required to establish unlawful assembly liability under BNS Section 149. Conditions: Bail was granted on Rs. 20,000 bond with strict conditions including prohibition from entering the village (except one applicant), non-contact with witnesses, surrender of identification documents, and weekly police reporting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA/685/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: BA/685/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted bail to all ten applicants in Crime No. 167 of 2025, arising from a mob assault that resulted in one death. The court found that while applicants participated in the unlawful assembly and assault, their individual roles were limited to kicks and blows without weapons, and mens rea could not be attributed to them individually. Key Reasoning: The court analyzed post-mortem evidence and witness statements, concluding that co-accused Wanya and Rosha—who wielded weapons—were the primary authors of fatal head injuries. The applicants' involvement with the deceased was less severe. Critically, the court found insufficient evidence that applicants shared a common object or knowledge required to establish unlawful assembly liability under BNS Section 149. Conditions: Bail was granted on Rs. 20,000 bond with strict conditions including prohibition from entering the village (except one applicant), non-contact with witnesses, surrender of identification documents, and weekly police reporting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case