NARAYAN ASARAM CHOPDE and ORS vs STATE OF MAHA and ORS Advocate - KAKADE AMOL NARHARI, RN DHORDE FOR R 11, 11-2 AND 14,COPY SERVED ON GP,R/7 TO 12 SERVED.,GP FOR R/1 TO 4 — WP/7019/2004
Case under Act Not Known. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030138492004
Filing Number
WP/25159/2004
Filing Date
01-Sep-2004
Registration No
WP/7019/2004
Registration Date
23-Nov-2004
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NARAYAN ASARAM CHOPDE and ORS
Adv. Badakh Vishal S.,Mudassir H. Shaikh,Mudassir H. Shaikh, ,Mudassir H. Shaikh
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHA and ORS Advocate - KAKADE AMOL NARHARI, RN DHORDE FOR R 11, 11-2 AND 14,COPY SERVED ON GP,R/7 TO 12 SERVED.,GP FOR R/1 TO 4
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed two writ petitions (WP/7019/2004 and WP/7036/2004) filed by Narayan Asaram Chopde and others against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners' counsel sought leave to withdraw the petitions, which the court granted. Consequently, all pending civil applications were also disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2009
Due Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde
-
25-Mar-2009
Due Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde
-
23-Mar-2009
Due Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde
-
06-Mar-2009
Due Order
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde
-
06-Feb-2009
Notification
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde
-
02-Dec-2005
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Sep-2004
Case filed
Registration No. WP/7019/2004
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed two writ petitions (WP/7019/2004 and WP/7036/2004) filed by Narayan Asaram Chopde and others against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners' counsel sought leave to withdraw the petitions, which the court granted. Consequently, all pending civil applications were also disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts