GUNDU MANIK BIRAJDAR @ SURWASE DIED THROUGH LEGAL REPR. VIJAY AND OTHERS. vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS. — CA/4462/2026

Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18. Disposed: Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 24th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030137352026

Filing Number

CA/10283/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

CA/4462/2026

Registration Date

16-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

24-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GUNDU MANIK BIRAJDAR @ SURWASE DIED THROUGH LEGAL REPR. VIJAY AND OTHERS.

    Adv. BIRAJDAR SOMESHWAR SANJAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. DeshmukhView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed the application to add the legal representatives of the deceased appellant Gundu Manik Surwase on record. The court partly allowed the withdrawal application, permitting 50% amount withdrawal with accrued interest upon furnishing undertaking. Additionally, a 571-day delay in filing the first appeal was condoned as non-intentional, allowing the appeal to proceed in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. DeshmukhView PDF

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/4462/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed the application to add the legal representatives of the deceased appellant Gundu Manik Surwase on record. The court partly allowed the withdrawal application, permitting 50% amount withdrawal with accrued interest upon furnishing undertaking. Additionally, a 571-day delay in filing the first appeal was condoned as non-intentional, allowing the appeal to proceed in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case