JAYESH DIGAMBAR SHINDE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — ABA/584/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED on 20th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030137332026
Filing Number
ABA/3442/2026
Filing Date
07-04-2026
Registration No
ABA/584/2026
Registration Date
07-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
20th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAYESH DIGAMBAR SHINDE
Adv. BHUSHAN MAHAJAN
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Adv. P.P. FOR R/1,ADV. MRS. RANJITA MAHAJAN FOR R. NO. 2 ( APPOINTED ) 1123
XYZ
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL - FIRST TIME
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | ANTICIPATORY BAIL - FIRST TIME |
| 20-04-2026 | |
| 17-04-2026 |
Orders
Case Summary: ABA/584/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) granted anticipatory bail to Jayesh Digambar Shinde, accused of kidnapping and sexual offences against a 17-year-old girl under Sections 137(2), 63(d)(6) BNS 2023 and Sections 4 & 8 POCSO Act 2012. The court found the girl voluntarily accompanied the applicant with intent to marry, evidenced by her consistent statements, stay in Shirdi, and medical examination showing no force or coercion. The court treated the borderline age of consent and consensual elopement as mitigating factors, citing Supreme Court precedent. Bail was granted on Rs. 50,000 bond with conditions including police reporting, non-interference with witnesses, and restricted entry to village Dhangaon. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: ABA/584/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) granted anticipatory bail to Jayesh Digambar Shinde, accused of kidnapping and sexual offences against a 17-year-old girl under Sections 137(2), 63(d)(6) BNS 2023 and Sections 4 & 8 POCSO Act 2012. The court found the girl voluntarily accompanied the applicant with intent to marry, evidenced by her consistent statements, stay in Shirdi, and medical examination showing no force or coercion. The court treated the borderline age of consent and consensual elopement as mitigating factors, citing Supreme Court precedent. Bail was granted on Rs. 50,000 bond with conditions including police reporting, non-interference with witnesses, and restricted entry to village Dhangaon. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts