PARMESHWAR RAGHOBA JARE AND ANOTHER vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/11993/2014

Case under Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM030137272014

Next Hearing

09th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/10493/2014

Filing Date

22-04-2014

Registration No

WP/11993/2014

Registration Date

30-12-2014

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet

Petitioner(s)

PARMESHWAR RAGHOBA JARE AND ANOTHER

Adv. Jayabhar Dattatraya R.

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

11-09-2020

DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL

09-06-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

09-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

Case Summary: The writ petition filed by Parmeshwar Raghoba Jare and another seeking compensation for 61 sweet lime trees on acquired land (Survey No. 45 and 46, Village Pimpalwani, Beed District) was dismissed as devoid of merits. The court found that the petitioners had an adequate remedy through the Section 18 reference proceeding and the pending First Appeal, making the writ petition unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The writ petition filed by Parmeshwar Raghoba Jare and another seeking compensation for 61 sweet lime trees on acquired land (Survey No. 45 and 46, Village Pimpalwani, Beed District) was dismissed as devoid of merits. The court found that the petitioners had an adequate remedy through the Section 18 reference proceeding and the pending First Appeal, making the writ petition unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case