PARMESHWAR RAGHOBA JARE AND ANOTHER vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/11993/2014

Case under Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Next hearing 09-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030137272014

Filing Number

WP/10493/2014

Filing Date

22-Apr-2014

Registration No

WP/11993/2014

Registration Date

30-Dec-2014

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARMESHWAR RAGHOBA JARE AND ANOTHER

    Adv. Jayabhar Dattatraya R.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant,hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF

    Case Summary: The writ petition filed by Parmeshwar Raghoba Jare and another seeking compensation for 61 sweet lime trees on acquired land (Survey No. 45 and 46, Village Pimpalwani, Beed District) was dismissed as devoid of merits. The court found that the petitioners had an adequate remedy through the Section 18 reference proceeding and the pending First Appeal, making the writ petition unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

  4. 11-Sep-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Nov-2014

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A. R. JoshiView PDF

  6. 03-Nov-2014

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A. R. JoshiView PDF

  7. 22-Apr-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/11993/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The writ petition filed by Parmeshwar Raghoba Jare and another seeking compensation for 61 sweet lime trees on acquired land (Survey No. 45 and 46, Village Pimpalwani, Beed District) was dismissed as devoid of merits. The court found that the petitioners had an adequate remedy through the Section 18 reference proceeding and the pending First Appeal, making the writ petition unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case