DNYANESHWAR UTTAMRAO RODEWAD CHANDRAKANT R THORAT AND OMPRAKASH D TOTAWAD vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/3975/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 14, 16 AND 226. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM030137182026

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/10271/2026

Filing Date

07-04-2026

Registration No

WP/3975/2026

Registration Date

16-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 14, 16 AND 226
Caste Claim - St

Petitioner(s)

DNYANESHWAR UTTAMRAO RODEWAD CHANDRAKANT R THORAT AND OMPRAKASH D TOTAWAD

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS

SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE VERIFICATION COMMITTEE, KINWAT-

THE EDUCATION OFFICER (SECONDARY)

JIJAMATA PRATHAMIK VIDYALAY

JIJAMATA PRATHAMIK VIDYALAY LOHAGAON

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

17-04-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

12-06-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Case Summary: WP 3975/2026 The High Court at Aurangabad issued notice to respondents returnable on 12.06.2026. As an interim measure, respondents 4 and 5 were restrained from taking coercive action pending the petition, subject to the petitioner filing an undertaking within two weeks that he will not claim service benefits such as promotion, increment, pay fixation, or confirmation during the pendency of the writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 3975/2026 The High Court at Aurangabad issued notice to respondents returnable on 12.06.2026. As an interim measure, respondents 4 and 5 were restrained from taking coercive action pending the petition, subject to the petitioner filing an undertaking within two weeks that he will not claim service benefits such as promotion, increment, pay fixation, or confirmation during the pendency of the writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case