SURESH UTTAMRAO RODEWAD CHANDRAKANT R THORAT AND OMPRAKASH D TOTAWAD vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/3994/2026

Case under Caste Claim - St Section 226. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM030137172026

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/10270/2026

Filing Date

07-04-2026

Registration No

WP/3994/2026

Registration Date

16-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Caste Claim - St Section 226

Petitioner(s)

SURESH UTTAMRAO RODEWAD CHANDRAKANT R THORAT AND OMPRAKASH D TOTAWAD

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS

SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFCATE VERIFICATION COMMITTEE, KINWAT-

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POST OFFICE (RAIL MAIL SERVICE)

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

17-04-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

12-06-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Case Summary: The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court issued notice to respondents returnable on 12.06.2026 in this writ petition. As interim relief, the court restrained respondent No. 3 (Superintendent of Post Office) from taking coercive action pending adjudication, conditional upon the petitioner filing an undertaking within two weeks that he will not claim service benefits such as promotion, increment, pay fixation, or confirmation during the petition's pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court issued notice to respondents returnable on 12.06.2026 in this writ petition. As interim relief, the court restrained respondent No. 3 (Superintendent of Post Office) from taking coercive action pending adjudication, conditional upon the petitioner filing an undertaking within two weeks that he will not claim service benefits such as promotion, increment, pay fixation, or confirmation during the petition's pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case