MUJEEBUDDIN NASIRUDDIN KAZI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — BA/669/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030136692026
Filing Number
BA/3420/2026
Filing Date
06-04-2026
Registration No
BA/669/2026
Registration Date
06-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MUJEEBUDDIN NASIRUDDIN KAZI
Adv. GHANEKAR NILESH S.
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Adv. P.P. FOR R/1,ADV. SUHAS R. SHIRSAT FOR R/2 (APPOINTED) 1123
XYZ
XYZ
XYZ
XYZ
XYZ
XYZ
XYZ
XYZ
XYZ
Adv. SHAIKH ASHRAF PATEL,SHAIKH ASHRAF PATEL AND VANDANA B. KAKDE FOR R/3 TO 9 Kakde Vandana Babanrao
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
REGULAR BAIL- FRESH
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | REGULAR BAIL- FRESH |
| 06-05-2026 | |
| 27-04-2026 |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad granted bail to Mujeebuddin Nasiruddin Kazi, a school teacher accused of outraging modesty of minor students under POCSO Act and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita sections. The court found that victim statements and parental testimonies failed to corroborate the prosecution case, CCTV footage was only partially objectionable requiring trial scrutiny, and a strained relationship between the applicant and school management suggested possible false implication. Bail was granted on conditions including Rs. 60,000 bond, non-contact with witnesses, and restrictions on entering the city except for trial dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad granted bail to Mujeebuddin Nasiruddin Kazi, a school teacher accused of outraging modesty of minor students under POCSO Act and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita sections. The court found that victim statements and parental testimonies failed to corroborate the prosecution case, CCTV footage was only partially objectionable requiring trial scrutiny, and a strained relationship between the applicant and school management suggested possible false implication. Bail was granted on conditions including Rs. 60,000 bond, non-contact with witnesses, and restrictions on entering the city except for trial dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts