DHAMMADIP ANAND KHILLARE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/5177/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030136232026
Filing Number
WP/10201/2026
Filing Date
06-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/5177/2026
Registration Date
06-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
Coram
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DHAMMADIP ANAND KHILLARE
Adv. Narwade Rohit Gautam
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND ORS
-
2.DIST. MAGISTRATE HINGOLI
-
3.POLICE PATIL RECRUITMENT COMMITTEE, HINGOLI
-
4.SWAPNIL KISAN LONKAR
-
5.ARVIND UTTAMRAO NARWADE
-
6.CHANDRAMUNI UTTAMRAO NARWADE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF
The High Court disposed of Dhammadip Anand Khillare's writ petition challenging the Police Patil selection list for village Raholi after the State confirmed his representation had already been decided. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the District Collector within one month, with a directive that any subsequent application before the Collector must be decided within one month thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
-
06-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5177/2026
The High Court disposed of Dhammadip Anand Khillare's writ petition challenging the Police Patil selection list for village Raholi after the State confirmed his representation had already been decided. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the District Collector within one month, with a directive that any subsequent application before the Collector must be decided within one month thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts