DHAMMADIP ANAND KHILLARE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/5177/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030136232026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/10201/2026

Filing Date

06-04-2026

Registration No

WP/5177/2026

Registration Date

06-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227
Mah.village Police Act 1967

Petitioner(s)

DHAMMADIP ANAND KHILLARE

Adv. Narwade Rohit Gautam

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND ORS

DIST. MAGISTRATE HINGOLI

POLICE PATIL RECRUITMENT COMMITTEE, HINGOLI

SWAPNIL KISAN LONKAR

ARVIND UTTAMRAO NARWADE

CHANDRAMUNI UTTAMRAO NARWADE

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

07-05-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

The High Court disposed of Dhammadip Anand Khillare's writ petition challenging the Police Patil selection list for village Raholi after the State confirmed his representation had already been decided. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the District Collector within one month, with a directive that any subsequent application before the Collector must be decided within one month thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court disposed of Dhammadip Anand Khillare's writ petition challenging the Police Patil selection list for village Raholi after the State confirmed his representation had already been decided. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the District Collector within one month, with a directive that any subsequent application before the Collector must be decided within one month thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case