Venkat Ramchandra Pawar vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR LATUR — CA/4986/2026
Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18. Disposed: Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030135422026
e-Filing Number
04-04-2026
Filing Number
CA/10137/2026
Filing Date
06-04-2026
Registration No
CA/4986/2026
Registration Date
24-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
LAND ACQUISITION - SINGLE BENCH ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Venkat Ramchandra Pawar
Adv. Sakolkar Vijay G.
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR LATUR
The Specail Land Acqusisition Officer Purna project Latur
The Executive Engineer MSED Latur
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
URGENT ORDERS (CIVIL)
FOR ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | URGENT ORDERS (CIVIL) |
| 05-05-2026 | FOR ORDERS |
Orders
Case Summary: The High Court at Aurangabad partially allowed Venkat Ramchandra Pawar's application to withdraw Rs. 1,76,69,893 in a land acquisition dispute involving the Purna Project in Latur. The State contested the amount as an exorbitant enhancement allegedly fixed arbitrarily without proper deductions. The court determined that justice would be served by permitting the applicant to receive 80% of the amount with accrued interest upon furnishing an undertaking to the Registrar. The court also condoned a delay of 822 days in preferring the appeal and confirmed the interim relief granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The High Court at Aurangabad partially allowed Venkat Ramchandra Pawar's application to withdraw Rs. 1,76,69,893 in a land acquisition dispute involving the Purna Project in Latur. The State contested the amount as an exorbitant enhancement allegedly fixed arbitrarily without proper deductions. The court determined that justice would be served by permitting the applicant to receive 80% of the amount with accrued interest upon furnishing an undertaking to the Registrar. The court also condoned a delay of 822 days in preferring the appeal and confirmed the interim relief granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts