SUNITA SADANANAD BOINWAD vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/4000/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030134722026

Filing Number

WP/10089/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/4000/2026

Registration Date

16-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNITA SADANANAD BOINWAD

    Adv. Vivekanand U Jadhav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS

  2. 2.THE SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, KINWAT-

  3. 3.THE UNDER SECRETARY GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/4000/2026 Outcome: The writ petition was adjourned. Notice was issued to respondents returnable on 12.06.2026. As interim relief, the court directed that Respondent No. 3 shall not take any coercive action pending adjudication, subject to the petitioner filing an undertaking within two weeks that she will not claim service benefits (promotion, increment, pay fixation, confirmation) during pendency of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4000/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/4000/2026 Outcome: The writ petition was adjourned. Notice was issued to respondents returnable on 12.06.2026. As interim relief, the court directed that Respondent No. 3 shall not take any coercive action pending adjudication, subject to the petitioner filing an undertaking within two weeks that she will not claim service benefits (promotion, increment, pay fixation, confirmation) during pendency of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case