SANDIP PREMSINGH RAJPUT JAMADAR vs THE REGISTRAR OF MONEY LENDING DHULE AND ANR — WP/3731/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030134662026

Filing Number

WP/10083/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/3731/2026

Registration Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227
Money Lending Regulation Act and Rules 2014

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANDIP PREMSINGH RAJPUT JAMADAR

    Adv. PATIL VIJAY BHALERAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE REGISTRAR OF MONEY LENDING DHULE AND ANR

    Adv. UJWAL S PATIL FOR R.NO. 2 1123

  2. 2.SMT. SARALABAI AJITSINGH RAJPUT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/3731/2026 The Aurangabad High Court partly allowed petitioner Sandip Rajput's writ petitions challenging "no cross order" passed in a money-lending dispute under Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014. The court quashed orders dated 04.03.2026 and 23.03.2026, finding that the petitioner's right to cross-examine the respondent's power-of-attorney witness was improperly denied. The court held that while power-of-attorney holder evidence is admissible when the witness has personal knowledge of the transaction, the petitioner cannot be prevented from cross-examination. The proceeding was remanded for cross-examination stage, with directions to complete the case within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  6. 08-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  7. 08-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3731/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/3731/2026 The Aurangabad High Court partly allowed petitioner Sandip Rajput's writ petitions challenging "no cross order" passed in a money-lending dispute under Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014. The court quashed orders dated 04.03.2026 and 23.03.2026, finding that the petitioner's right to cross-examine the respondent's power-of-attorney witness was improperly denied. The court held that while power-of-attorney holder evidence is admissible when the witness has personal knowledge of the transaction, the petitioner cannot be prevented from cross-examination. The proceeding was remanded for cross-examination stage, with directions to complete the case within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case