DEEPAK DATTATRAYA BHIDE AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — ABA/568/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED on 20th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030134432026
Filing Number
ABA/3367/2026
Filing Date
04-Apr-2026
Registration No
ABA/568/2026
Registration Date
06-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
20-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DEEPAK DATTATRAYA BHIDE AND OTHERS
Adv. Bhide Vinod Y.
-
2.ARTI DEEPAK BHIDE
-
3.AMEY @ TEJAS DEEPAK BHIDE
-
4.AMRUTA AVDHOOT KULKARNI @ AMRUTA DEEPAK BHIDE
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Adv. P.P. FOR R/1 AND R/2 1123
-
2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF
Summary The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted anticipatory bail to five applicants accused of abetting the suicide of a college student. The court found that while the suicide note mentions the applicants, the allegations are general in nature with no specific incidents of harassment proximately linked to the suicide, and that criminal liability requires a direct causal connection under Section 306 IPC. All applicants were released on Rs. 50,000 bond each with conditions including regular police reporting and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
—
Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
—
Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ABA/568/2026
Summary The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted anticipatory bail to five applicants accused of abetting the suicide of a college student. The court found that while the suicide note mentions the applicants, the allegations are general in nature with no specific incidents of harassment proximately linked to the suicide, and that criminal liability requires a direct causal connection under Section 306 IPC. All applicants were released on Rs. 50,000 bond each with conditions including regular police reporting and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts