KSHITIJ RAMESH NIKAM vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — WP/465/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227. Disposed: Contested--Withdrawn on 17th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM030134262026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

01-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/3363/2026

Filing Date

04-04-2026

Registration No

WP/465/2026

Registration Date

06-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Withdrawn

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226, 227
Protection of Women from Domestic Voilence Act 2005 Section 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 26

Petitioner(s)

KSHITIJ RAMESH NIKAM

Adv. Deshpande Shantanu A.

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

ASHWINI KSHITIJ NIKAM ALIAS ASHWINI RAJENDRA MAHAJAN

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN

08-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS

15-06-2026

FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the writ petition filed by Kshitij Ramesh Nikam challenging a rejection order dated 18.03.2026, as the petitioner's counsel sought and obtained permission to withdraw it. However, the court directed that the pending interim maintenance application filed by the complainant (Ashwini Kshitij Nikam) be decided within two months, noting the proceedings had been pending since 27.09.2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the writ petition filed by Kshitij Ramesh Nikam challenging a rejection order dated 18.03.2026, as the petitioner's counsel sought and obtained permission to withdraw it. However, the court directed that the pending interim maintenance application filed by the complainant (Ashwini Kshitij Nikam) be decided within two months, noting the proceedings had been pending since 27.09.2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case