DATTRAO JADBAJI ADKINE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR HINGOLI AND ORS — WP/5060/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030133602026

Filing Number

WP/10004/2026

Filing Date

04-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/5060/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Coram

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DATTRAO JADBAJI ADKINE

    Adv. Syed G R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR HINGOLI AND ORS

  2. 2.THE PROJECT DIRECTOR NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA

  3. 3.THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF

    The High Court rejected the petitioner's plea for immediate compensation payment under a Supplementary Award dated 11.11.2020, as the award itself was under arbitral challenge. The court directed the Arbitrator/District Collector, Hingoli to conclude the arbitration proceedings within four months, accepting the state's undertaking to finalize the decision within that timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5060/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court rejected the petitioner's plea for immediate compensation payment under a Supplementary Award dated 11.11.2020, as the award itself was under arbitral challenge. The court directed the Arbitrator/District Collector, Hingoli to conclude the arbitration proceedings within four months, accepting the state's undertaking to finalize the decision within that timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case