ROHINI DATTA ADAGALE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — APPLN/1179/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030132992025
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
e-Filing Number
23-03-2025
Filing Number
APPLN/3173/2025
Filing Date
27-03-2025
Registration No
APPLN/1179/2025
Registration Date
28-03-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ROHINI DATTA ADAGALE
Adv. GANDHI AMOL SUBHASH
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Adv. P.P. FOR R/1 1123
DATTA LAXMAN ADAGALE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS
URGENT ORDERS -CRIMINAL
DUE ORDERS CRIMINAL
DUE ORDER AWAIT SERVICE CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS
FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2025 | FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS |
| 19-06-2026 | URGENT ORDERS -CRIMINAL |
| 18-09-2025 | DUE ORDERS CRIMINAL |
| 21-08-2025 | DUE ORDER AWAIT SERVICE CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS |
| 09-07-2025 | FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
Summary: In Criminal Application No. 1179/2025 before the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench), the case was adjourned. The notice to respondent no. 2 (Datta Laxman Adagale) was returned unserved as he was not residing at the given address. The court re-issued notice returnable on 19.6.2026 and directed the investigating officer to effect service upon respondent no. 2 either in person or through WhatsApp or other permissible modes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Criminal Application No. 1179/2025 before the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench), the case was adjourned. The notice to respondent no. 2 (Datta Laxman Adagale) was returned unserved as he was not residing at the given address. The court re-issued notice returnable on 19.6.2026 and directed the investigating officer to effect service upon respondent no. 2 either in person or through WhatsApp or other permissible modes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts