MAHESH SUBHAS DOMBE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE PRINCIPLE SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/5088/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030131252026
Filing Number
WP/9819/2026
Filing Date
02-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/5088/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
Coram
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHESH SUBHAS DOMBE
Adv. GANDHI AMOL SUBHASH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE PRINCIPLE SECRETARY AND ORS
-
2.THE MAHARASHTRA LABOR WELFARE BOARD THR. THE COMMISSIONER
-
3.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
-
4.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE PARBHANI
-
5.NAVA MONDHA POLICE STATION PARBHANI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the writ petition filed by Mahesh Subhas Dombe against the State of Maharashtra upon the petitioner's request to withdraw. The court granted liberty to pursue appropriate proceedings before the relevant forum-authority, directing that any time spent in this petition be considered for limitation purposes if applicable, while keeping all contentions open. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
-
02-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5088/2026
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the writ petition filed by Mahesh Subhas Dombe against the State of Maharashtra upon the petitioner's request to withdraw. The court granted liberty to pursue appropriate proceedings before the relevant forum-authority, directing that any time spent in this petition be considered for limitation purposes if applicable, while keeping all contentions open. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts