BALU BHAU RATHOD vs RAJARAM MANSING RATHOD AND ORS — WP/4496/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 21 AND 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030131082026

Filing Number

WP/9802/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/4496/2026

Registration Date

23-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 21 AND 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BALU BHAU RATHOD

    Adv. Kadam Jaydeep Samadhan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJARAM MANSING RATHOD AND ORS

    Adv. SUSHANT B CHOUDHARI FOR R.NO. 1 TO 11 1123

  2. 2.BULCHAND GANPAT RATHOD

  3. 3.LIMBA GANPAT RATHOD

  4. 4.SHOBHA AMBADAS RATHOD

  5. 5.NARAYAN AMBADAS RATHOD

  6. 6.SHIVAJI MANSING RATHOD

  7. 7.REVAN MANSING RATHOD

  8. 8.SHANTABAI VINAYAK RATHOD

  9. 9.GANESH VINAYAK RATHOD

  10. 10.RAMESH VINAYAK RATHOD

  11. 11.SAVITA VINAYAK RATHOD

  12. 12.SHRIDHAR NARAYAN SANGULE

  13. 13.JAGANNATH HUNA RATHOD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    The High Court allowed Balu Bhau Rathod's writ petition challenging a lower court order in a land acquisition compensation dispute under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act. The court granted the petitioner one additional opportunity to cross-examine witnesses on evidence affidavits, finding that procedural fairness required this remedy given previous scheduling failures. The relief was conditional upon the petitioner depositing Rs. 5,000 as cost with the reference court within two weeks, to be paid to the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4496/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court allowed Balu Bhau Rathod's writ petition challenging a lower court order in a land acquisition compensation dispute under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act. The court granted the petitioner one additional opportunity to cross-examine witnesses on evidence affidavits, finding that procedural fairness required this remedy given previous scheduling failures. The relief was conditional upon the petitioner depositing Rs. 5,000 as cost with the reference court within two weeks, to be paid to the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case