MAHEBOOB SHAIKH MAKBOOL SHAIKH AND ANOTHER vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/629/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: --APPLICATION ALLOWED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030130712026

Filing Number

BA/3295/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

BA/629/2026

Registration Date

01-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--APPLICATION ALLOWED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115,118,125,189,190,191,296,333

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHEBOOB SHAIKH MAKBOOL SHAIKH AND ANOTHER

    Adv. Rathi Swapnil S.

  2. 2.SHAIKH MAKBOOL SHAIKH MAHEBOOB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

    Adv. P.P. FOR R/SOLE 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted bail to four applicants in Crime No. 262 of 2025, finding their allegations comparable to previously bailed co-accused. The court noted no specific overt acts were clearly attributed to the applicants, and the victim's shoulder fracture injury did not establish sufficient mens rea despite the state's opposing arguments. Bail was granted on conditions including ₹25,000 personal recognizance bonds with sureties, restrictions on witness contact, and surrender of identity documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Due Admission (Criminal)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA/629/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted bail to four applicants in Crime No. 262 of 2025, finding their allegations comparable to previously bailed co-accused. The court noted no specific overt acts were clearly attributed to the applicants, and the victim's shoulder fracture injury did not establish sufficient mens rea despite the state's opposing arguments. Bail was granted on conditions including ₹25,000 personal recognizance bonds with sureties, restrictions on witness contact, and surrender of identity documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case