RAMESHCHAND UTTAMCHAND JAJU vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/5070/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 14, 21, 300 AND 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030130492026

Filing Number

WP/9752/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/5070/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Coram

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 14, 21, 300 AND 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMESHCHAND UTTAMCHAND JAJU

    Adv. BRAMHANKAR RAKESH C.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND ORS

  2. 2.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

  3. 3.THE DEPUTY ENGINEER

  4. 4.M.S. SHRINATHJI BUILDCON THR. ITS PROPRETOR MR. SOHAM HARESH PALEJA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The court found the matter involved disputed questions of fact regarding road construction on the petitioner's land—specifically whether authorities wrongly shifted the road route from another farmer's land to his land (6 feet width)—which cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction. The petition was withdrawn with liberty for the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority or Civil Court for relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5070/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The court found the matter involved disputed questions of fact regarding road construction on the petitioner's land—specifically whether authorities wrongly shifted the road route from another farmer's land to his land (6 feet width)—which cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction. The petition was withdrawn with liberty for the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority or Civil Court for relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case