PRAMOD REVCHAND AMRAO AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — APPLN/1255/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030130482026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

APPLN/3287/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

APPLN/1255/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85, 115(2), 351(3), 352, 3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAMOD REVCHAND AMRAO AND OTHERS

    Adv. KARAN ASHOK GAIKWAD

  2. 2.USHABAI REVCHAND AMRAO

  3. 3.REVCHAND PUNJARI AMRAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.DIKSHA PRAMOD AMRAO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    For Admission - Fresh - Criminal Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  4. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed the criminal application and quashed FIR No. 0008/2025 registered against the husband and in-laws for offences under sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, after the husband and wife (original informant) amicably settled their matrimonial dispute and filed for divorce by mutual consent. The court found that continuation of criminal proceedings in a matrimonial case where parties have genuinely resolved disputes would be futile and oppressive, citing Supreme Court precedent that such cases should be quashed when parties achieve settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 24-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  6. 24-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. APPLN/1255/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed the criminal application and quashed FIR No. 0008/2025 registered against the husband and in-laws for offences under sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, after the husband and wife (original informant) amicably settled their matrimonial dispute and filed for divorce by mutual consent. The court found that continuation of criminal proceedings in a matrimonial case where parties have genuinely resolved disputes would be futile and oppressive, citing Supreme Court precedent that such cases should be quashed when parties achieve settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case