DATTATRAY RAJARAM PATHAK vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — APPLN/1156/2025

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 482. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Next hearing 19-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030129962025

e-Filing Number

13-01-2025

Filing Number

APPLN/3088/2025

Filing Date

26-Mar-2025

Registration No

APPLN/1156/2025

Registration Date

27-Mar-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 482
Indian Penal Code (I.p.c) Section 420, 465, 471, 474, 500, 501, 384, 34
Information Technology Act, 2000 (Amended 2008) Section 66(D)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DATTATRAY RAJARAM PATHAK

    Adv. ZAWARE SUVARNA M.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

    Adv. APP For R.Nos.1 and 2.,R.NO.3 IS SERVED. 1123

  2. 2.THE POLICE STATION OFFICER KOTWALI POLICE STATION

  3. 3.ABHIJEET RAJESH KOTHARI

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Due Admission -Criminal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) recalled its previous order dated 10.04.2026 in Criminal Application No. 1156/2025 filed by Dattatray Rajaram Pathak against the State of Maharashtra. The recall was necessitated because the mediation referral order was inadvertently passed in this petition due to wrong mentioning by the advocate, when it was intended for another matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Due Admission -Criminal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    Due Admission -Criminal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Due Admission -Criminal

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar

  9. 12-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. VenegavkarView PDF

  10. 12-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar

  11. 01-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. VenegavkarView PDF

  12. 01-Oct-2025

    Due Admission (Criminal)

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar

  13. 25-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF

  14. 25-Aug-2025

    Due Admission (Criminal)

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh

  15. 08-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. DeshmukhView PDF

  16. 08-Aug-2025

    Due Admission -Criminal

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh

  17. 11-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. DeshmukhView PDF

  18. 11-Jul-2025

    Due Orders Criminal

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh

  19. 17-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. DeshmukhView PDF

  20. 17-Jun-2025

    For Admission - Fresh - Criminal Side Matters

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh

  21. 25-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. DeshmukhView PDF

  22. 25-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 26-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. APPLN/1156/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) recalled its previous order dated 10.04.2026 in Criminal Application No. 1156/2025 filed by Dattatray Rajaram Pathak against the State of Maharashtra. The recall was necessitated because the mediation referral order was inadvertently passed in this petition due to wrong mentioning by the advocate, when it was intended for another matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case