ANNA MOKINDA PADAR (DIED) THR LEGAL HEIRS INDRABAI ANNA PADAR. vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS. — HCBM30129142026

Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM030129142026

Filing Number

FA/9661/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Judge

Shri R. A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)

Coram

Shri R. A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

LAND ACQUISITION - SINGLE BENCH ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANNA MOKINDA PADAR (DIED) THR LEGAL HEIRS INDRABAI ANNA PADAR.

    Adv. Jadhav Kailas B

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS.

  2. 2.THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, (M.I.) JALNA

  3. 3.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, NIMNA DUDHANA PROJECT DIVISION, SELU

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Shri R. A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)View PDF

    In this land acquisition appeal before the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad, the court heard arguments from the appellant's advocate and addressed a procedural objection regarding the absence of the deceased original claimant's surname in the certified copy of the judgment and award. The court found that the nomenclature issue was rectified in the appeal memo and did not affect the party designation, thereby waiving the objection and allowing the proceedings to continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Objections Not Removed (Second Time)

    Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)

  4. 05-May-2026

    Objections Not Removed (First Time)

    Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)

  5. 28-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

In this land acquisition appeal before the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad, the court heard arguments from the appellant's advocate and addressed a procedural objection regarding the absence of the deceased original claimant's surname in the certified copy of the judgment and award. The court found that the nomenclature issue was rectified in the appeal memo and did not affect the party designation, thereby waiving the objection and allowing the proceedings to continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case