GREEN VALLY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL THROUGH ITS SECRETARY vs THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/3918/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030128662026
Filing Number
WP/9623/2026
Filing Date
01-04-2026
Registration No
WP/3918/2026
Registration Date
15-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
Coram
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GREEN VALLY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL THROUGH ITS SECRETARY
Adv. DESHMUKH SHAMBHURAJE V
Respondent(s)
THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. ITS SECETARY SHCOOL EDUCATION AND SPORTS DEPARTMENT
THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION (PRIMARY)
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION
THE EDUCATION OFFICER-PRIMARY
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of multiple writ petitions filed by private schools seeking reimbursement of fees for 25% of students admitted under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The court directed respondents to independently scrutinize each petitioner's proposal on merit and issue a decision within four weeks, with payment to be made within four weeks thereafter if the petitioners are found entitled to reimbursement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of multiple writ petitions filed by private schools seeking reimbursement of fees for 25% of students admitted under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The court directed respondents to independently scrutinize each petitioner's proposal on merit and issue a decision within four weeks, with payment to be made within four weeks thereafter if the petitioners are found entitled to reimbursement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts