SACHIN PANDURANG GURSUDKAR vs GAYATRI @ SWATI SACHIN GURSUDKAR — WP/5369/2019

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 22-Nov-2019

CNR: HCBM030128292018

Filing Number

WP/10127/2018

Filing Date

04-Apr-2018

Registration No

WP/5369/2019

Registration Date

03-May-2019

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Hindu Marrage Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SACHIN PANDURANG GURSUDKAR

    Adv. AMBORE SHARAD S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GAYATRI @ SWATI SACHIN GURSUDKAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of Writ Petition No. 5369/2019 between Sachin Pandurang Gursudkar and Gayatri @ Swati Sachin Gursudkar, finding that an earlier writ petition (WP 14632/2017) involving the same parties had already been disposed on 19.12.2019 following a settlement. Since the dispute was already resolved, nothing remained for consideration in the present petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2020

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    According To Sitting List

  4. 22-Nov-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil P. DeshmukhView PDF

  5. 22-Nov-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 04-Apr-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5369/2019

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of Writ Petition No. 5369/2019 between Sachin Pandurang Gursudkar and Gayatri @ Swati Sachin Gursudkar, finding that an earlier writ petition (WP 14632/2017) involving the same parties had already been disposed on 19.12.2019 following a settlement. Since the dispute was already resolved, nothing remained for consideration in the present petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case