YUNUS MAHEMUD PATEL. vs THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, HAVING OFFICE AT INCOME TAX BHAVAN LATUR. — HCBM30126232026
Case under Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM030126232026
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
ITA/9439/2026
Filing Date
30-03-2026
Judge
SHRI R. A. SASNE (REGISTRAR JUDL.)
Coram
SHRI R. A. SASNE (REGISTRAR JUDL.)
Bench Type
Division
Category
INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
YUNUS MAHEMUD PATEL.
Adv. MALPANI MOHIT RAJENDRA
Respondent(s)
THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, HAVING OFFICE AT INCOME TAX BHAVAN LATUR.
Hearing History
Judge: SHRI R. A. SASNE (REGISTRAR JUDL.)
OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME)
OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME) |
| 05-05-2026 | OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME) |
| 09-06-2026 |
Orders
The document provided is not a case judgment for Yunus Mahemud Patel v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Latur. Instead, it is a procedural order from the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench dated 09/06/2026, concerning multiple appeals (Income Tax Appeals, First Appeals, and Family Court Appeals) that were listed for removal of office objections. The order grants appellants a final two-week extension to cure procedural defects. If objections are not removed within this period, registration of all listed appeals shall be automatically refused without further court reference. This document does not address the merits of the Patel case or contain any substantive judgment. SKIP - The provided document does not contain the actual case order for the specified case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The document provided is not a case judgment for Yunus Mahemud Patel v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Latur. Instead, it is a procedural order from the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench dated 09/06/2026, concerning multiple appeals (Income Tax Appeals, First Appeals, and Family Court Appeals) that were listed for removal of office objections. The order grants appellants a final two-week extension to cure procedural defects. If objections are not removed within this period, registration of all listed appeals shall be automatically refused without further court reference. This document does not address the merits of the Patel case or contain any substantive judgment. SKIP - The provided document does not contain the actual case order for the specified case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts