YUNUS MAHEMUD PATEL. vs THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, HAVING OFFICE AT INCOME TAX BHAVAN LATUR. — HCBM30126232026

Case under Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM030126232026

Filing Number

ITA/9439/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

Shri R. A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)

Coram

Shri R. A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)

Bench Type

Division

Category

INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YUNUS MAHEMUD PATEL.

    Adv. MALPANI MOHIT RAJENDRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, HAVING OFFICE AT INCOME TAX BHAVAN LATUR.

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Shri R. A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)View PDF

    The document provided is not a case judgment for Yunus Mahemud Patel v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Latur. Instead, it is a procedural order from the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench dated 09/06/2026, concerning multiple appeals (Income Tax Appeals, First Appeals, and Family Court Appeals) that were listed for removal of office objections. The order grants appellants a final two-week extension to cure procedural defects. If objections are not removed within this period, registration of all listed appeals shall be automatically refused without further court reference. This document does not address the merits of the Patel case or contain any substantive judgment. SKIP - The provided document does not contain the actual case order for the specified case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    —

    Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)

  4. 05-May-2026

    Objections Not Removed (First Time)

    Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)

  5. 28-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The document provided is not a case judgment for Yunus Mahemud Patel v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Latur. Instead, it is a procedural order from the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench dated 09/06/2026, concerning multiple appeals (Income Tax Appeals, First Appeals, and Family Court Appeals) that were listed for removal of office objections. The order grants appellants a final two-week extension to cure procedural defects. If objections are not removed within this period, registration of all listed appeals shall be automatically refused without further court reference. This document does not address the merits of the Patel case or contain any substantive judgment. SKIP - The provided document does not contain the actual case order for the specified case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case