SUDHAKAR RAMA SHELKE. vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ORS. — CA/4650/2026

Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18. Disposed: --Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030126162026

Filing Number

CA/9433/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

CA/4650/2026

Registration Date

18-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUDHAKAR RAMA SHELKE.

    Adv. PATIL LAXMIKANT C.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF

    Case Summary: CA/4650/2026 The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed Sudhakar Rama Shelke's application to withdraw the deposited compensation amount in a land acquisition case. The court permitted withdrawal of the full deposited amount with accrued interest, conditioned upon the applicant furnishing an undertaking to redeposit the amount with interest if the state's appeal succeeds, balancing the applicant's hardship as a poor farmer against the state's recovery concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/4650/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CA/4650/2026 The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed Sudhakar Rama Shelke's application to withdraw the deposited compensation amount in a land acquisition case. The court permitted withdrawal of the full deposited amount with accrued interest, conditioned upon the applicant furnishing an undertaking to redeposit the amount with interest if the state's appeal succeeds, balancing the applicant's hardship as a poor farmer against the state's recovery concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case