DEVIDAS BHAURAO MAGAR. vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ORS. — CA/4602/2026

Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18. Disposed: --Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030126122026

Filing Number

CA/9429/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

CA/4602/2026

Registration Date

18-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEVIDAS BHAURAO MAGAR.

    Adv. PATIL LAXMIKANT C.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed Devidas Bhaurao Magar's application to withdraw 50% of the compensation amount deposited by the acquiring body in a land acquisition case. The court permitted withdrawal subject to the condition that the applicant furnish an undertaking to redeposit the amount with accrued interest if the acquiring body's appeal succeeds, balancing the applicant's financial hardship as a poor agriculturist against the state's recovery interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/4602/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed Devidas Bhaurao Magar's application to withdraw 50% of the compensation amount deposited by the acquiring body in a land acquisition case. The court permitted withdrawal subject to the condition that the applicant furnish an undertaking to redeposit the amount with accrued interest if the acquiring body's appeal succeeds, balancing the applicant's financial hardship as a poor agriculturist against the state's recovery interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case