Komal Jay Kuklod ADV AMIT TANDULKAR vs Jay Nandlal Kuklod — MCA/92/2026

Case under Transfer Matter Section 24. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Next hearing 19-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030125952026

e-Filing Number

23-03-2026

Filing Number

MCA/9417/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCA/92/2026

Registration Date

04-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Transfer Matter Section 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Komal Jay Kuklod ADV AMIT TANDULKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jay Nandlal Kuklod

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF

    Case Summary: MCA/92/2026 Outcome: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) vacated the interim stay of proceedings that had been granted on 10.04.2026. The court found no necessity to continue the stay, noting that video conferencing facilities are available and personal appearance of parties is not mandatory in civil proceedings. The matter was adjourned to 19.06.2026, with permission for the applicant to seek video conferencing participation before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-May-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCA/92/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCA/92/2026 Outcome: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) vacated the interim stay of proceedings that had been granted on 10.04.2026. The court found no necessity to continue the stay, noting that video conferencing facilities are available and personal appearance of parties is not mandatory in civil proceedings. The matter was adjourned to 19.06.2026, with permission for the applicant to seek video conferencing participation before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case