GANESH SITARAM KANADE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/600/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030124862026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

BA/3144/2026

Filing Date

27-03-2026

Registration No

BA/600/2026

Registration Date

27-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Supression of Immoral Traffic in Women,girls Act Section 3,4,5,7,8

Petitioner(s)

GANESH SITARAM KANADE

Adv. Sonawane Sunita G.

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Adv. P.P. FOR R/SOLE 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME

02-04-2026

REGULAR BAIL- FRESH

06-05-2026
21-04-2026

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted bail to Ganesh Sitaram Kanade, a hotel proprietor arrested for offences under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act and BNS 2023, following a police raid discovering prostitution activities at his premises. Despite acknowledging his five prior similar offences and rejecting his claim of ignorance, the court held that prior criminal history alone cannot deny bail and imposed stringent conditions including a ₹70,000 bond, residential restrictions, and prohibition from illegal activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted bail to Ganesh Sitaram Kanade, a hotel proprietor arrested for offences under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act and BNS 2023, following a police raid discovering prostitution activities at his premises. Despite acknowledging his five prior similar offences and rejecting his claim of ignorance, the court held that prior criminal history alone cannot deny bail and imposed stringent conditions including a ₹70,000 bond, residential restrictions, and prohibition from illegal activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case