GANGARAM CHANDU SINDLON vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE AND FOREST DEPARTMENT AND ORS — WP/3916/2026

Case under Mines & Minerals (Reg.& Develp) Act 1957 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030124332026

Filing Number

WP/9296/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/3916/2026

Registration Date

15-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

Coram

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Mines & Minerals (Reg.& Develp) Act 1957 Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GANGARAM CHANDU SINDLON

    Adv. SYED AZIZODDIN R.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE AND FOREST DEPARTMENT AND ORS

  2. 2.THE COLLECTOR

  3. 3.THE DISTRICT MINIG OFFICER

  4. 4.THE TAHSILDAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. DhoteView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the writ petition by directing Respondent No. 2 (Maharashtra Revenue and Forest Department Secretary) to decide the petitioner's representation dated 23.03.2026 within two weeks. The court accepted the state's undertaking to decide the matter within the specified timeframe rather than adjudicating the petition on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3916/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the writ petition by directing Respondent No. 2 (Maharashtra Revenue and Forest Department Secretary) to decide the petitioner's representation dated 23.03.2026 within two weeks. The court accepted the state's undertaking to decide the matter within the specified timeframe rather than adjudicating the petition on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case