GANPATI DATTU SURVE AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY PANNING DEPARTMENT AND ORS — WP/5069/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030124212026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/9286/2026

Filing Date

27-03-2026

Registration No

WP/5069/2026

Registration Date

05-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013

Petitioner(s)

GANPATI DATTU SURVE AND ORS

Adv. SHEKADE SHASHIKANT E

JALINDAR PANDURANG SURVE

JANABAI PRABHU SURVE

ARUNA ASHOK SURVE

ASHOK DEORAO SURVE

PRABHU DEORAO SURVE

PANDURANG BAYAJI SURYVE

RANGNATH VADAJU SURVE

SUNDERRAO VADJU SURVE

SADASHIV VADAJU SURVE

BABAN VADAJU SURVE

PAWAN MARUTI SURVE

DNYANESHWAR MARUTI SURVE

ASHRUBA MANIK SURVE

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY PANNING DEPARTMENT AND ORS

THE DISTIRCT COLLECTOR BEED

DEPUTY COLLECTOR

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

06-05-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

The Aurangabad High Court dismissed the writ petition after finding that petitioners had suppressed their prior application under Section 64 of the Land Acquisition Act, 2013 before the Competent Authority, failing to approach the court with clean hands. The court allowed withdrawal of the petition with liberty to pursue interest claims under Section 80 of the 2013 Act before the Competent Authority, which shall expeditiously dispose of the original petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Aurangabad High Court dismissed the writ petition after finding that petitioners had suppressed their prior application under Section 64 of the Land Acquisition Act, 2013 before the Competent Authority, failing to approach the court with clean hands. The court allowed withdrawal of the petition with liberty to pursue interest claims under Section 80 of the 2013 Act before the Competent Authority, which shall expeditiously dispose of the original petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case