GANPATI DATTU SURVE AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY PANNING DEPARTMENT AND ORS — WP/5069/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030124212026

Filing Number

WP/9286/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/5069/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Coram

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GANPATI DATTU SURVE AND ORS

    Adv. SHEKADE SHASHIKANT E

  2. 2.JALINDAR PANDURANG SURVE

  3. 3.JANABAI PRABHU SURVE

  4. 4.ARUNA ASHOK SURVE

  5. 5.ASHOK DEORAO SURVE

  6. 6.PRABHU DEORAO SURVE

  7. 7.PANDURANG BAYAJI SURYVE

  8. 8.RANGNATH VADAJU SURVE

  9. 9.SUNDERRAO VADJU SURVE

  10. 10.SADASHIV VADAJU SURVE

  11. 11.BABAN VADAJU SURVE

  12. 12.PAWAN MARUTI SURVE

  13. 13.DNYANESHWAR MARUTI SURVE

  14. 14.ASHRUBA MANIK SURVE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY PANNING DEPARTMENT AND ORS

  2. 2.THE DISTIRCT COLLECTOR BEED

  3. 3.DEPUTY COLLECTOR

  4. 4.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF

    The Aurangabad High Court dismissed the writ petition after finding that petitioners had suppressed their prior application under Section 64 of the Land Acquisition Act, 2013 before the Competent Authority, failing to approach the court with clean hands. The court allowed withdrawal of the petition with liberty to pursue interest claims under Section 80 of the 2013 Act before the Competent Authority, which shall expeditiously dispose of the original petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5069/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Aurangabad High Court dismissed the writ petition after finding that petitioners had suppressed their prior application under Section 64 of the Land Acquisition Act, 2013 before the Competent Authority, failing to approach the court with clean hands. The court allowed withdrawal of the petition with liberty to pursue interest claims under Section 80 of the 2013 Act before the Competent Authority, which shall expeditiously dispose of the original petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case