RAJKUMAR CHANDRABHAN WAGHMARE AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY PANNING DEPARTMENT AND ORS — WP/5073/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030124182026
Next Hearing
06th May 2026
Filing Number
WP/9283/2026
Filing Date
27-03-2026
Registration No
WP/5073/2026
Registration Date
05-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJKUMAR CHANDRABHAN WAGHMARE AND ORS
Adv. SHEKADE SHASHIKANT E
GANDHARAIBAI CHANDRABHAN WAGHMARE
HANUMAN CHANDRABHAN WAGHWMARE
BABU DIGAMBAR WAGHMARE
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY PANNING DEPARTMENT AND ORS
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR BEED
DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LAND ACQUISITION)
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/5073/2026 The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition, finding that petitioners had suppressed their pending petition under Section 64 of the Land Acquisition Act, 2013 before the Competent Authority seeking similar relief. The court ruled that the petitioners should pursue their claims for interest under Section 80 of the 2013 Act before the Competent Authority rather than through writ jurisdiction, and directed the Competent Authority to expeditiously dispose of the original petition/reference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/5073/2026 The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition, finding that petitioners had suppressed their pending petition under Section 64 of the Land Acquisition Act, 2013 before the Competent Authority seeking similar relief. The court ruled that the petitioners should pursue their claims for interest under Section 80 of the 2013 Act before the Competent Authority rather than through writ jurisdiction, and directed the Competent Authority to expeditiously dispose of the original petition/reference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts