RAJKUMAR CHANDRABHAN WAGHMARE AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY PANNING DEPARTMENT AND ORS — WP/5073/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030124182026
Filing Number
WP/9283/2026
Filing Date
27-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/5073/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
Coram
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJKUMAR CHANDRABHAN WAGHMARE AND ORS
Adv. SHEKADE SHASHIKANT E
-
2.GANDHARAIBAI CHANDRABHAN WAGHMARE
-
3.HANUMAN CHANDRABHAN WAGHWMARE
-
4.BABU DIGAMBAR WAGHMARE
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY PANNING DEPARTMENT AND ORS
-
2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR BEED
-
3.DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LAND ACQUISITION)
-
4.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
Case History
-
06-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF
Case Summary: WP/5073/2026 The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition, finding that petitioners had suppressed their pending petition under Section 64 of the Land Acquisition Act, 2013 before the Competent Authority seeking similar relief. The court ruled that the petitioners should pursue their claims for interest under Section 80 of the 2013 Act before the Competent Authority rather than through writ jurisdiction, and directed the Competent Authority to expeditiously dispose of the original petition/reference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
-
27-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5073/2026
Case Summary: WP/5073/2026 The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition, finding that petitioners had suppressed their pending petition under Section 64 of the Land Acquisition Act, 2013 before the Competent Authority seeking similar relief. The court ruled that the petitioners should pursue their claims for interest under Section 80 of the 2013 Act before the Competent Authority rather than through writ jurisdiction, and directed the Competent Authority to expeditiously dispose of the original petition/reference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts