DEVENDRA NAGNATH AMLE AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/5166/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 300, 21. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030123312026
Filing Number
WP/9217/2026
Filing Date
26-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/5166/2026
Registration Date
06-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
Coram
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
Bench Type
Division
Category
SERVICE MATTERS OTHER THAN ID ACT AND RELATED ENACTMENT ( 35 )
Sub-Category
OTHER ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DEVENDRA NAGNATH AMLE AND ORS
Adv. Bodke Patil Poonam V.
-
2.NARAYAN DEVENDRA AMLE
-
3.VISHAL VAIJANATHAPPA KINKAR
-
4.VAIJINATH MALLIKARJUN KINKAR
-
5.NEELKANTH MALLIKARJUN KINKAR
-
6.MAKRAND VYANKATRAO ALIAS VYANKATESH KULKARNI
-
7.KAUSTUBH SAKHARAM KULKARNI MINOR THROUGH MOTHER ARATI S KULKARNI
-
8.CHAITANYA VYANKATRAO ALIAS VYANKATESH KULKARNI
-
9.KULDEEP KISHORJI PATIL
-
10.NAKUL KISHORJI PATIL
-
11.MAROTI KISAN SONAVANE DIED THROUGH HIS LR UTTAM MAROTI SONAVANE
-
12.MAROATI CHANDRAKANT SONAVANE MINOR THROUGH MOTHER SUKUMAR C SONAVANE
-
13.SANGRAM UTTAM SONAVANE
-
14.MAHADEV DATTU SONAVANE
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS
-
2.THE COLLECTOR LATUR
-
3.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF ENGINEER
-
4.THE CHIEF ENGINEER AURANGABAD
-
5.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER LATUR
-
6.THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
-
7.THE MANAGING DIRECTOR MAHARASHTRA STATE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
-
8.THE MANAGING DIRECTOR VICE PRESIDENT THE MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF
Case Summary: The petition challenging the Maharashtra PWD's road expansion/upgrading without proper land acquisition procedures was adjourned to 17.06.2026. The court found no documentary evidence on record showing petitioners' lands were affected and noted petitioners sought relief (Writ of Mandamus for road measurement) more appropriately obtainable from the appropriate authority. Petitioners are granted liberty to file necessary documents and additional affidavit before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5166/2026
Case Summary: The petition challenging the Maharashtra PWD's road expansion/upgrading without proper land acquisition procedures was adjourned to 17.06.2026. The court found no documentary evidence on record showing petitioners' lands were affected and noted petitioners sought relief (Writ of Mandamus for road measurement) more appropriately obtainable from the appropriate authority. Petitioners are granted liberty to file necessary documents and additional affidavit before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts