MIRZA ATHAR BAIG MIRZA ZAFARULLAH BAIG vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — WP/412/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030123282026

e-Filing Number

25-03-2026

Filing Number

WP/3103/2026

Filing Date

26-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/412/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MIRZA ATHAR BAIG MIRZA ZAFARULLAH BAIG

    Adv. NARWADKAR MRIGESH D.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

    Adv. ,BHAGAT NAGORAO TULSHIRAM,BHAGAT NAGORAO TULSHIRAM NOTE OF APPERANCE FILED FOR R/1 1123

  2. 2.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

    Adv. COPY SERVED TO PP

  3. 3.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

    The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court directed the District Collector, Nanded (Respondent No.3) to expedite processing of the petitioner's arms license application for two non-prohibited bore weapons within five weeks instead of the stated ten weeks. The court accepted the petitioner's contention that as a sportsperson, he needed the license for practice purposes and imposed contempt consequences for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Admission - Fresh - Criminal Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/412/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court directed the District Collector, Nanded (Respondent No.3) to expedite processing of the petitioner's arms license application for two non-prohibited bore weapons within five weeks instead of the stated ten weeks. The court accepted the petitioner's contention that as a sportsperson, he needed the license for practice purposes and imposed contempt consequences for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case