SANJAY DAGDU SONAWANE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/3685/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM030121772026

Next Hearing

30th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/9106/2026

Filing Date

26-03-2026

Registration No

WP/3685/2026

Registration Date

06-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Caste Claim - St

Petitioner(s)

SANJAY DAGDU SONAWANE

Adv. Phatale Sagar S

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS

Adv. AGP FOR R.NOS. 1 AND 2 1123

SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE

ZILLA PARISHAD, SAMBHAJINAGAR

HEADMASTER ZILLA PARISHA PRIMARY SCHOOL, PALSHI

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

07-04-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

30-06-2026

AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

05-05-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

05-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the writ petition filed by Sanjay Dagdu Sonawane against the State of Maharashtra and the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee to 30 June 2026. The counsel for respondents 3 and 4 was granted time to file a formal appearance (Vakalatnama), and any interim relief granted to the petitioner continues until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the writ petition filed by Sanjay Dagdu Sonawane against the State of Maharashtra and the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee to 30 June 2026. The counsel for respondents 3 and 4 was granted time to file a formal appearance (Vakalatnama), and any interim relief granted to the petitioner continues until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case