AMOL ASHOK SONPASARE vs THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER AND ANOTHER — WP/406/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030121382026
Next Hearing
06th May 2026
e-Filing Number
17-03-2026
Filing Number
WP/3053/2026
Filing Date
25-03-2026
Registration No
WP/406/2026
Registration Date
26-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AMOL ASHOK SONPASARE
Adv. Pawar Vaibhav U.
Respondent(s)
THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER AND ANOTHER
Adv. APP for R.Nos.1 to 4. 1123
The Superintendent of Police Parbhani, Dist Parbhani
The Sub Divisional Magistrate Sub Division Selu Tq Selu Dist Parbhani
Police Station Officer Police Station Bori Tq Jintur Dist Parbhani
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN
FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS
FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS |
| 06-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted ad-interim relief by staying the externment order dated 28.11.2025 passed against petitioner Amol Ashok Sonpasare under Section 60 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. Notice was issued to respondents returnable on 06.05.2026, with the petitioner's counsel arguing the externment order was excessive, based on stayed offences, and lacked nexus between alleged crimes and the order. The court suspended both the Divisional Commissioner's order dated 02.03.2025 and the SDM's externment order pending final disposal of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted ad-interim relief by staying the externment order dated 28.11.2025 passed against petitioner Amol Ashok Sonpasare under Section 60 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. Notice was issued to respondents returnable on 06.05.2026, with the petitioner's counsel arguing the externment order was excessive, based on stayed offences, and lacked nexus between alleged crimes and the order. The court suspended both the Divisional Commissioner's order dated 02.03.2025 and the SDM's externment order pending final disposal of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts